文章摘要
社会工作专业服务的本土框架和理论依据 ——一项本土专业服务场域的动态分析?
The theoretical framework for social worker practice in China: A analysis on the dynamics of the working field
投稿时间:2017-06-12  修订日期:2017-06-12
DOI:
中文关键词: 社会工作,社区居委会,场景服务
英文关键词: Social Work  Glass-rooted committee  Contextualized services
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
童敏* 厦门大学社会学与社会工作系教授、博士生导师 xbcy@cau.edu.cn 
史天琪 厦门大学社会学与社会工作系博士生  
摘要点击次数: 1301
全文下载次数: 1210
中文摘要:
      近十年来,在政府的大力推动下,中国社会工作的发展已经由体制外逐渐走进体制内,与体制的融合成为最迫切、最关键的问题,而融合的最基础专业服务场域就是社区。文章针对社区专业社会工作者与居委会动态关联的分析发现:(1)居委会承担着管理和服务双重角色,采取综合管理服务方式,与追求专业服务的社会工作存在不同的服务逻辑;(2)借助项目综合社会工作服务,能够把专业社会工作服务与居委会的综合管理服务融合起来。两种常见的融合方式,一是注重社区整体能力提升的社区社会工作;二是关注专项服务延伸的社区的社会工作;(3)本土社会工作专业服务的理论依据是“双主体(社会工作者和居委会)”的项目综合社会工作服务的场景服务逻辑,有别于西方七八十年出现的注重在实际生活场景中开展的综合社会工作服务逻辑。
英文摘要:
      In the last decade, the social work practice is in a stage of being integrated into a part of regime system in China with the great push of the government. It is the community that become an important working field for social work practice. This article is aimed to study the dynamics between social worker and glass-rooted committee, and find that: a) the glass-rooted committee assumes a double roles, which needs to balance governing and service and is different from the professional helping service; b) the local professional social work service can be integrated into glass-rooted committee’ service through the planning of integrated social work services; c) the local social work service is based on the theories of contextualized services which is totally different from institutional services.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器