|
| 间接驱逐与身份改造——大都市郊区农业规模经营的治理逻辑 |
| Indirect Expel and Identity Transformation: The Logic of Governing Agricultural Scale Management in the Suburb Area of Metropolis——based on the Observation of the Practice of the Agricultural Governance in the Suburb Area of Shanghai |
| 投稿时间：2016-07-06 修订日期：2016-09-18 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: “土客替代” 异地务农者 规模经营 农业治理 |
| 英文关键词: ‘Settlers replace natives’ Farming settlers Agricultural scale management The governance of agriculture |
| 基金项目:本文系国家社科基金青年项目“土地流转与农民生计模式转变研究”（项目编号：15CSH041），以及中央高校基本科研业务费探索研究基金项目：“四化同步”背景下新型农业经营主体发展研究（项目编号：WE1524306）的阶段性成果。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1367 |
| 全文下载次数: 478 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 在大都市城郊的农业生产领域,由于本地农民的退出,异地务农者成为地方农业发展的主力,农业劳动力的“土客替代”现象普遍发生。异地务农者为大都市城郊农业做出贡献的同时,也产生了一系列的治理顽疾。作为回应,地方政府推进农业规模经营,希图以此来化解基层社会的治理困境。文章以上海城郊农业规模经营的实践为典型案例,着重分析粮食生产领域的实质性规模经营,与经济作物种植领域的形式化规模经营,如何分别实现对异地务农者的间接驱逐和身份改造,最终达至地方政府的治理目标。研究发现,大城市郊区农业规模经营已超越纯粹的经济逻辑,隐含着深刻的治理意蕴,这与中西部纯农区的农业规模经营有着本质的不同。依靠政府过度干预并以社会治理为依归的农业规模经营,在实践中扭曲着资源配置,并暴露出可持续性的危机,因此,其难以成为中国农业未来的发展方向,更不具备推广价值。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In the field of agricultural production in the suburb area of metropolis, there is a prevalent phenomenon: ‘settlers replace natives’, which means farming settlers replace farming natives to be the main force of local agricultural development. In spit of farming settlers’ contribution to the agriculture in the suburb area of metropolis, they also bring about a series of recurring illness. In response to this, local government prompted agricultural scale management, hoping to get rid of the trap of governing the grass-roots society. This essay will take the practice of agricultural scale management in the suburb area if Shanghai as typical example, and focus on the analysis of substantial scale management in the field of alimentary crop production and the formalized scale management in the field if economic crop planting. This essay will also explore how to realize the indirect expel and the identity transformation of the farming settlers, and finally achieve the local government’s governing goal. As is shown in the research, the agricultural scale management is beyond pure economic logic, and it implicates profound meaning about governing, which is substantially different from the pure agricultural area in the mid-west. The latter is an agricultural scale management which is dependent in government’s over-intervention and is based on social governance, exposing crisis of sustainable development. As a result, it is hard to become the future development direction in agriculture of China, let alone has value for popularization. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
