|
| 基层治理中的利益网络化运作 |
| The interests of the network and Grassroots governance |
| 投稿时间：2015-06-27 修订日期：2016-01-04 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 治理 富人治村 灰色力量 利益网络 |
| 英文关键词: Governance Economic elite Gray Power Interest of the network |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1699 |
| 全文下载次数: 541 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 内容：城乡结合部地区的农村因要素市场化与利益集聚不断冲击着原有的乡村治理体制,基层治理中呈现的“内卷化”与合法性危机成为主要问题。然而农村社区治理主体所产生的变异并没有造成大规模的治理矛盾和冲突,其原因在于“富人治村”或者说灰色力量的渗透是有其村庄治理的运作策略,他们的行动策略也会构建一定的治理结构。富人和灰色力量通过利益网络化的策略进入村庄治理结构,在获得村庄治理主体位置的时候又反过来通过利益网络支配村庄治理格局。利益网络化运作是一种双向流动的过程,既是富人得以维持其地位的支撑结构,同时也是他们得以支配村庄的工具。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Rural urban fringe areas and due to market factors continue to impact the interests of gathering original village governance system, "Internalization" grass-roots governance and legitimacy crisis presented a major problem. However, the governance body variation produced by rural communities did not cause large-scale governance contradictions and conflicts, the reason is that on the one hand in front of the huge interest generated logic of atomic individualism Community interest, on the other hand, "the rich rule the village" and gray penetration forces are operating their village governance policies, their action strategies will build certain governance structure. Mir digestion, so rich and gray forces entered the village governance structure through a network of policy interests, when in position to get the village governance body in turn dominated by the interests of village governance structure network. The interests of the network operation is a process of two-way flow of both the rich to maintain its position supporting structure, but also a tool that they can dominate the village. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
