|
| 中国农村研究的主体回归与方法论创新 |
| TheSstudySofSChineseSruralSsubjectSregressionSandSmethodologicalSinnovation— BasedSonStheSreflectionSofScurrentSChina |
| 投稿时间：2015-04-16 修订日期：2015-06-15 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 村庄研究 悖论 市场化 农村治理 |
| 英文关键词: village study paradoxes marketization rural governance |
| 基金项目:本文系2011年教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“现代化进程中的世界农村和农民问题研究”(11JJD840007)；2011年国家社会科学重大项目“在社会管理体制创新中推动基层民主发展”(11 ZD029)研究成果。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2196 |
| 全文下载次数: 676 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 21世纪以来,中国农村治理研究陷入了本土化与主体性双重困境,中国农村社会基础的深度转型,农村研究方法的缺陷以及大规模村庄研究的局限,要求中国农村研究回归深度的村庄研究,尊重农民主体性。在回归村庄研究的方法论上,文章认为要突破国家政权建设理论等研究视角的局限,把市场化这一变量纳入分析视野中。村庄主位、农民主体、市场化过程同国家宏观治理体系的互动逻辑,应该构成后中国农村治理研究时代的主要内容。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| From the 21thcentury, China Rural Governance Research has got into a double dilemma with localization and subjectivity. The fact that deeply transition of China rural social basement, the shortcoming of research methods on rural issues and the limitation of large-scale study of the village all make contribution to the requirements that China rural study should return to the depth village study work and respect farmers’ subjectivity. On the return to the methodology of village research, our article believes that we should break through the limitation of national state sovereign construction theory and other perspectives. Besides, we should make a consideration about the variable quantity, the marketization, bringing it into the methodological scheme. The village head status, the farmer main body status and the interaction logical of marketization with national macro management system should be constituted by the main content of the rural China governance research era. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
