|
| “底层社会与抗争性政治”还是“基层社会与创造性政治”——农民政治行为两种分析框架比较及重构 |
| “Bottom of the Society and Contentious Politics” VS “Grassroots Society and Creative Politics ——Compare and Reconstruction of Two Analytical Framework for Peasant’s Political Behavior |
| 投稿时间：2014-06-17 修订日期：2014-12-08 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: “底层社会与抗争性政治” “基层社会与创造性政治” 农民 政治行为 重构 |
| 英文关键词: “bottom of the society and contentious politics” “grassroots society and creative politics peasant political behavior reconstruct |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1595 |
| 全文下载次数: 548 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 农民政治行为研究有两种分析框架,“底层社会与抗争性政治”分析框架渊源于农民政治行为“顺从与反抗”的经典模式,关注底层社会及其抗争性行动。“基层社会创造性政治”分析框架从三个方面批评“底层社会与抗争性政治”分析框架,一是认为其误解了1949年后的国家与农民关系；二是指控其革命意味太浓；三是认为其未看到农民抗争行动的创造性后果。同时,从重新界定当代中国国家与农民关系、以“基层社会”取代“底层社会”和以“创造性政治”取代“抗争性政治”三个方面建构自己的分析范式。二者在分析范式、研究对象和学术影响三个方面各有不同,融合二者,重构一个“底层社会与抗争-创造性政治”分析框架对农民政治行为研究具有重要意义。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| There are two analytical frameworks for study peasant’s political behavior, which are framework of “bottom of the society and contentious politics” and framework of grassroots society and creative politics. The former origins in classical mode of peasant’s political behavior, and pay much attention to bottom of the society and contentious actions. While the latter critics the former from three aspects: first one is its misunderstanding the relation between the state and the peasant; second one is accusing its too much revolutionary meaning; third one is its ignoring the creative consequences of peasant’s contentious actions. At the same time, the latter framework has constructed its own analysis paradigm from three directions, which are redefining the relations between state and peasant in modern China; and replacing “bottom of society” by “grassroots society”, and replacing “contentious politics” by “creative politics”. Both of the frameworks are different from each other in three aspects, which are analysis paradigm, study object and academic impact. Integrating two frameworks so as to reconstruct a new framework of “bottom of the society and contentious and creative politics” will be of great importance for study peasant’s political behavior. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
