|
| 从西方社会科学到中国社会科学的反思 |
| Reflection from Western Social Science to Chinese Social Science |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 西方社会科学 移植 中国社会科学 自主性 |
| 英文关键词: Western social science Transplantation Chinese academy of social science Autonomy |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 621 |
| 全文下载次数: 165 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 文章以邓正来的主要学术旨向和贡献为基本论据，阐述如下观点：西方社会科学，是源于西方社会又自洽于它的社会科学，与现代资本主义世界经济体系之间有着相辅相成的关系；近现代以来从西方社会科学到中国社会科学的运动和制度化过程中，出现了一个明显问题，即作为群体的中国知识分子以“集体性不意识”和“前反思性接受”的方式，对西方的“现代化范式”进行“移植”，导致了中国社会科学的总体性范式危机，扼杀了中国社会科学自主性建构的可能性；中国社会科学的发展应遵偱什么样的路径，如何实现邓正来以建构“依据中国、走向世界”为学术定位的思想，是赋予超越于学派、阅历和研究旨趣之差别的中国知识分子“殊途同归”的、艰辛漫长的时代使命 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Based on Deng Zhenglai’s main academic points and contribution, this paper expounds the proposition that “Western social science isn’t equal to social science”: Western social science originated in and is suitable to the western society, it has a complementary relationship with the modern capitalist world economy. A group of intellectuals in China regard the western social science equivalent to the social science, they show “collective consciousness” and “pre-reflective acceptance” to “transplant” “western modernization paradigm”, which results in the consequences of overarching paradigm crisis of China social science and the impossibility of constructing Chinese social science’s autonomy. Deng Zhenglai takes the “According to China, go to the world” as his academic orientation, which endows the Chinese intellectuals with the arduous and lengthy era mission to transcend the differences between the schools, experiences and research interests to establish Chinese academic autonomy |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
