|
| 乡镇政权研究: 何在、何为又走向何处
———兼评欧阳静《策略主义: 桔镇运作的逻辑》 |
| Township Government: What，Why and Its Future———Comments on“Strategy Principle: The Study onthe Ju Township Government”of Ouyang Jing |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 乡镇政权 公司主义 简约主义 策略主义 |
| 英文关键词: Township government Corporatism Minimalist Strategy principle |
| 基金项目:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助《后农业税时代乡村治理关系与模式的实证研究》
( KYZ201007) 。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 751 |
| 全文下载次数: 160 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 当前学术界关于乡镇政权的研究呈现出多种面相: 在乡镇何在的定位中，往往只关注了国
家体制、乡村社会及官僚机器三个维度中的某一方面; 乡镇何为主要集中于“公司主义”与“简约主义”
的争论; 而在乡镇何向中，对国家和乡镇的权力建设的理解亦有不同的偏重。欧阳静以乡镇为主位，将
“策略主义”提升为乡镇运作逻辑的新模式，综合并深化对了对乡镇政权的研究。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The current academic research on township government contains multiple aspects，includingstudy on township
positioning was only focus on one part among state system，rural society and bureaucratic system; as for why they did it，the
relevant study are mainly highlight the debate between“corporatism”and“minimalist”; as for their future，the present understanding
of state’s and township power construction had different emphasizes． In this article，the author considered．
Ouyang Jing’s researchon township-based strategy obviously would put forward“strategy principle”as the township management
logic and would also deepen the study of township regime． |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
