|
| 地理标志与植物品种名称的关系及其法律规制 |
| On the Relation and It's Legal Regulations between GIs and PlantVariety Denomination: Taking“Fenghuang Dancong”as an Example |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 地理标志 植物品种名称 通用名称 凤凰单丛 规制 |
| 英文关键词: Gis Plant variety denomination Generic name Fenghuang Dancong Legal regulations |
| 基金项目:潮州市哲学社会科学“十二五”规划课题( 潮州2011－B－01) 。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 976 |
| 全文下载次数: 148 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 大量地理标志产品名称与在先植物品种名称相同，这可能既导致消费者混淆，也引起竞争
者对地理标志合法性异议。与欧盟法及《知识产权协定》不同，中国法律没有明确规定如何处理两者关
系，理论研究几乎空白。为免消费者混淆，与在先植物品种名称完全相同的地理标志，及部分相同但误
导消费者的地理标志不得注册; 部分相同且不误导消费者的可以注册。在判断是否相同时，中国地理标
志产品规章参照欧盟的规定，以地理标志产品名称为比较对象; 中国商标法和《知识产权协定》则以整
个标志为比较对象。综合考虑，中国地理标志法应以整个标志为比较对象。为协调已注册地理标志与
在先品种名称间的关系，地理标志权利人应容许他人正当使用品种名称。在品种名称命名方面，应该限
制使用地理名称。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Lots of GIs hold the same names with the prior plant varieties，which could easily cause consumer confusion and
competitors' objection to geographical indications． Unlike EU law and TRIPS，Chinese law does not specify how to deal with
their relationship and the relevant research is almost deficient． In order to avoid consumer confusion，the indications that are
identical with the prior name of plant varieties may not be registered． The indications that are partly homonymous with the
name of plant varieties may be registered provided consumers would not be liable to confuse． While China's regulations on
product of GIs，with reference to the Directives of EU，taking the names of GIs as the objects; China's Trademark Law and
the TRIPS take the entire logo as the objects when comparing． Considering the actual situation，China's GIs law should take
the entire logo to compare． For the coordination of the registered GIs and prior names of plant varieties，owners of GIs
should tolerate others use the names of plant varieties properly，and the law shall set limitations on using geographical
names in naming plant varieties． |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
