|
| 无“法”维权与成员资格
———多重支配下的“代耕农” |
| Membership and No-Right-to-Protect-Right———The Daigengnongs in Multiple-Domination |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 代耕农 成员资格 多重支配 无法维权 |
| 英文关键词: Daigengnongs Membership, Multiple-domination No right to resist |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1034 |
| 全文下载次数: 146 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 以往关于农民维权的研究都忽略了维权本身的权利从何而来的问题。我们认为农民只有
在具备乡村行政设置中的成员资格以及乡村伦理中的道德成员位置时, 其维权行动才可能有效。文章
通过对一个由特殊的群体——— “代耕农”组成的村落, 描述其村民从有成员资格到无成员资格的过程,
在经验上补充了“依法抗争” “以法抗争”等研究框架所忽略的维权状态——— 无法维权;在理论上, 扩展
了“合法性困境”的“所指”范围, 并分析了由资本、基层政府以及地方权力所组成的多重支配系统, 如何
构成了“代耕农”的抗争困境。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Previous research on farmer resistance was based on the presumption that farmers have the right to resist. However, in the author's viewpoint, one's right to resist is acquired only when he/ she gets civic membership in country administration up build, as well as the moral member position in country ethics. Through the procedural “from qualified to
disqualified”description of a migratory village, this essay adds in experience to research frameworks “rightful resistance”、
“struggle by law”———the neglected resistance status “no right to protect right”. Also, it extends in theory the range of
“legality dilemma”, and analyzes how this change of “the right to rule”-centered pattern resulted in the dilemma of “no
right to resist”, in order to revise connotation involving “transitivity and complexity”in the concept of “power-right net-
work”. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
