文章摘要
何为人类学启蒙? 20世纪的若干教诲
What is Anthropological Enlightenment?Some Lessons of the Twentieth Century
  
DOI:
中文关键词: 启蒙  文化  人类学  
英文关键词: Enlightenment  Culture  Anthropology
基金项目:
作者单位
马歇尔·萨林斯 美国芝加哥大学人类学系教授 
摘要点击次数: 602
全文下载次数: 145
中文摘要:
      与进化的发展中承袭下来的观点正相反,不管是政治上的左派还是右派,帝国资本主义的幸存者变得既不是全像也不是一点都不像我们。与20世纪中叶的"失望理论"(即依附理论在逻辑上和历史上的先驱)背道而驰的是,幸存下来的本土人民,意图去为曾经在他们身上发生过的那些东西负起文化的责任。穿越北美北部的大部分地区,即使是狩猎者和采集者也主要通过打猎和采集而生存了下来。爱斯基摩人仍然是在那里,而且他们仍然是爱斯基摩人。全世界的人都在接受一个谎言,即在理论上去接受传统与变迁、本土文化与现代性、城镇人与部落人之间的对立,还有其他一些既有的人类学智慧的陈词滥调。关于本土文化消逝的报道就像人类学的终结一样是被夸大了。 更多还原
英文摘要:
      Abstract Contrary to the inherited notions of progressive development, whether of the州itical left or right, the surviv- ing victims of imperial capitalism neither became all alike nor just like us. Contrary to the "despondency theory" of mid- century, the logical and historical precursor of dependency theory, surviving indigenous peoples aim to take cultural re- sponsibility for what has been done to them. Across large parts of northern North America, even hunters and gatherers live, largely by hunting and gathering. The Eskimo are still there, and they are still Eskimo. Around the world the peo- ples give the lie to received theoretical oppositions between tradition and change, indigenous culture and modernity, townsmen and tribesmen, and other cliches of the received anthropological wisdom. Reports of the death of indigenous cultures-as of the demise of anthropology-have been exaggerated.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器